The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a mic, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of a growing number of technologies, the baby monitors came to adapt complex innovations into their designs.
Presently, there are baby monitors that range from only audio to high definition video recording devices, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto security, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it’s created to do: enable you to check your child’s safety and comfort with ease, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of options available, we have singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 grabbed our attention for getting the ideal mix of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Vava vs Infant Optics Baby Monitor
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, such as “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers because of its easy interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors on the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction to the marketplace. Vava vs Infant Optics Baby Monitor
Both baby monitors are preferred by consumers for their ease of use at home. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost security, giving parents additional reassurance — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Aside from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both baby monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the world wide web, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is most suitable for night or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is ideal for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your infant for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Vava vs Infant Optics Baby Monitor
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it is a common fact that baby monitors tend to burn off their batteries out due to extended hours powered ). Infant Optics DXR-8 is conducted on lithium-ion batteries and may be replaced. While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged into last through the night.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even looks off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; and its antennae are not that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it could fall from a table and still be fine.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent presence on lists of baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. Though many of their features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 specification which makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Vava vs Infant Optics Baby Monitor
Concerning installation, Infant Optics’ easy installation can’t be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a percentage of their charge every month, so expect to need replacements often, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to drop, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is quite limited and needs to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you want to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features Vava vs Infant Optics Baby Monitor
Though the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was really a rather counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and will not be able to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is set up somewhere very close to the child.
In general, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this case).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Vava vs Infant Optics Baby Monitor
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases on the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competition that actually resembles the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s tough to ignore this new kid on the block. Vava vs Infant Optics Baby Monitor
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer image of your baby, but unless you’re planning to make vlogs from your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older model. It’s temperature monitoring, which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which allows you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are 2 things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring larger kids that have a lot more mobility than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light awake when the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud noises (such as extreme yelling ), which is beneficial for customers that are hard of hearing.
Vava vs Infant Optics Baby Monitor
As may be expected from a gadget with several features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be harder to install for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with a program that you will need to download, and so on. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is just one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission issues, compromising your family’s security. Since it is dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency might be an issue. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound doesn’t have the exact same security issues nor the reliance on the Internet.
It can look like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we are not denying that it truly does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price gap, we’re pretty sure the much more affordable Infant Optics does the same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Vava vs Infant Optics Baby Monitor
These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the obvious choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how busy your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around the home. At the end of the day, all it must do is to allow you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.