The very first baby monitor was developed in the 30s, accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting. It began as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of a growing number of technologies, the infant monitors came to accommodate complex innovations into their designs.
Presently, there are baby monitors that range from purely audio to high definition video recording devices, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto safety, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it is created to do: enable you to check your child’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of options available, we’ve singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 captured our attention for getting the ideal mix of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Summer Infant vs Infant Optics
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they have been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers for its simple interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors in the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction to the market. Summer Infant vs Infant Optics
Both baby monitors are preferred by consumers due to their ease of use at home. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents additional peace of mind — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their personal space! Apart from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both baby monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the world wide web, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is most suitable for night or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Summer Infant vs Infant Optics
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it is a frequent truth that baby monitors tend to burn off their batteries out because of extended hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 is conducted on lithium-ion batteries and may be replaced. While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it has been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged into last through the evening.
Last, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even appears off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; and its antennae are not that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be fine.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent appearance on lists of best baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. Though many of the features are very similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 specification that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other features.
Summer Infant vs Infant Optics
In terms of installation, Infant Optics’ simple installation can’t be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a proportion of their charge each month, so expect to need replacements often, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature changes. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly bigger screen, but the view is very limited and needs to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you would like to see the whole room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being adjusted.
No Unnecessary Features Summer Infant vs Infant Optics
Though the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was actually a quite counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and will not be able to tell what is happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very close to the child.
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this case).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Summer Infant vs Infant Optics
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases in the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competition that really resembles the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s tough to dismiss this new kid on the block. Summer Infant vs Infant Optics
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer image of your baby, but unless you’re planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older model. It’s temperature monitoring, which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which allows you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are 2 things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring bigger kids that have much more movement than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light awake if the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud noises (for example, extreme yelling ), which is beneficial for customers that are hard of hearing.
Summer Infant vs Infant Optics
As may be expected from a gadget with multiple features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be harder to install for the technologically challenged. It definitely requires more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with an app that you will need to download, etc. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission issues, endangering your family’s security. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency may be an issue. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound does not have the exact same security problems nor the reliance on the Internet.
It may look like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we’re not denying that it truly does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price difference, we’re pretty sure the far more affordable Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Summer Infant vs Infant Optics
All these baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the clear choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how active your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around your house. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to allow you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.