The very first baby monitor was developed in the 30s, accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the infant monitors came to accommodate complex innovations into their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from purely sound to high definition video recording devices, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto security, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it’s created to do: enable you to look at your baby’s safety and comfort with ease, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of choices available, we’ve singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 captured our attention for getting the ideal combination of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Summer Infant Baby Touch Monitor vs Infant Optics Dxr
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, such as “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers for its easy interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors on the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction into the marketplace. Summer Infant Baby Touch Monitor vs Infant Optics Dxr
Both baby monitors are favored by customers for their ease of use in the home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost security, giving parents additional reassurance — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their private space! Apart from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both baby monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the world wide web, reducing risks of undesirable data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for nighttime or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is ideal for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your infant for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Summer Infant Baby Touch Monitor vs Infant Optics Dxr
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it is a frequent truth that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out due to extended hours powered ). Infant Optics DXR-8 is run on lithium-ion batteries and can be substituted. While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it has been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the night.
Last, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even looks off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; and its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be okay.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also maintains a consistent presence on lists of baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. Though many of their features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 specification which makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Summer Infant Baby Touch Monitor vs Infant Optics Dxr
Concerning setup, Infant Optics’ simple installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time necessary for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a percentage of their charge each month, so expect to need replacements often, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to drop, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature changes. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With respect to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is very limited and needs to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you would like to see the whole room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being adjusted.
No Unnecessary Features Summer Infant Baby Touch Monitor vs Infant Optics Dxr
Though the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was really a rather counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and won’t have the ability to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is set up somewhere very near the child.
In general, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this instance ).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Summer Infant Baby Touch Monitor vs Infant Optics Dxr
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a number of the more current releases on the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competition that really looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it is hard to dismiss this new kid on the block. Summer Infant Baby Touch Monitor vs Infant Optics Dxr
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you’re planning to make vlogs from your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older model. It’s temperature monitoring, which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which allows you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring bigger kids that have much more movement than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light alert when the baby-end monitor picks up very loud noises (for example, extreme crying), which can be beneficial for consumers who are hard of hearing.
Summer Infant Baby Touch Monitor vs Infant Optics Dxr
As can be expected from a gadget with multiple features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with an app that you will need to download, etc. As mentioned previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is just one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more prone to hacking or transmission difficulties, endangering your family’s safety. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency may be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end audio and video does not have the exact same security issues nor the reliance on having to go online.
It may seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we’re not denying that it actually does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you’re probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price difference, we are pretty certain the far cheaper Infant Optics does the same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Summer Infant Baby Touch Monitor vs Infant Optics Dxr
These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we’ve established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the clear choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how busy your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you would like to use it to communicate with family scattered around the home. At the end of the day, all it must do is to allow you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.