The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a mic, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of a growing number of technologies, the baby monitors came to adapt complex innovations in their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from only sound to high definition video recording devices, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto security, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does what it’s created to do: enable you to look at your baby’s safety and comfort with ease, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of options available, we have singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for many years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 captured our attention for getting the right combination of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Summer Infant Baby Pixel vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they have been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers because of its simple interface and dependability. It’s no surprise that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors in the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction to the marketplace. Summer Infant Baby Pixel vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
Both baby monitors are favored by customers for their ease of use in the home. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost security, giving parents extra peace of mind — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Aside from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both infant monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the world wide web, reducing risks of undesirable data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is most suitable for night or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the entire nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Summer Infant Baby Pixel vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it’s a common fact that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out because of extended hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 is run on lithium-ion batteries and can be replaced. While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the evening.
Last, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even looks off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; and its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be fine.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent appearance on lists of baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. Though many of the features are very similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 specification that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other features.
Summer Infant Baby Pixel vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
Concerning setup, Infant Optics’ simple installation can’t be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a percentage of their charge every month, so expect to need replacements often, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) is not encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to drop, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With respect to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is quite limited and has to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you want to see the whole room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there’s some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features Summer Infant Baby Pixel vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
Although the Motorola boasts of being able to play 5 lullabies, it was really a rather counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and will not be able to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is set up somewhere very near the child.
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this case).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Summer Infant Baby Pixel vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a number of the more current releases in the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competition that actually looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s tough to ignore this new kid on the block. Summer Infant Baby Pixel vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs from your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older version. It’s temperature monitoring, which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which allows you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring bigger kids that have a lot more movement than in-crib babies. The next is a vibration or LED light awake if the baby-end monitor picks up very loud noises (such as extreme yelling ), which is beneficial for consumers who are hard of hearing.
Summer Infant Baby Pixel vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
As may be expected from a gadget with multiple features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to install for the technologically challenged. It definitely requires more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with an app that you will need to download, and so on. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more prone to hacking or transmission difficulties, endangering your family’s security. Since it is dependent on your phone and an online connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency might be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound doesn’t have the same security problems nor the reliance on the Internet.
It can look like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we’re not denying that it truly does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you’re probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are far more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price gap, we are pretty certain the much cheaper Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Summer Infant Baby Pixel vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
All these baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the clear choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how busy your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around your house. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to allow you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.