The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a mic, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the infant monitors came to accommodate complex innovations in their designs.
Presently, there are baby monitors that range from purely sound to high definition video recording devices, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto security, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does what it is created to do: allow you to check your baby’s safety and comfort with ease, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of choices available, we’ve singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 grabbed our attention for getting the ideal mix of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Samsung Wisenet vs Infant Optics
Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, such as “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers for its easy interface and dependability. It’s no surprise that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors in the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction into the marketplace. Samsung Wisenet vs Infant Optics
Both baby monitors are favored by customers for their ease of use in the home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost security, giving parents additional peace of mind — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Apart from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both infant monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the world wide web, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for nighttime or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is ideal for viewing the entire nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched off and on, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Samsung Wisenet vs Infant Optics
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it is a frequent truth that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out because of prolonged hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 is run on lithium-ion batteries and may be substituted. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the night.
Last, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even looks off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; and its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be okay.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent presence on lists of best baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. Though many of the features are very similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 specification which makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other features.
Samsung Wisenet vs Infant Optics
In terms of setup, Infant Optics’ easy installation can’t be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a proportion of their charge every month, so expect to need replacements often, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) is not encouraged. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature changes. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly bigger screen, but the view is very limited and needs to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you want to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there’s some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being adjusted.
No Unnecessary Features Samsung Wisenet vs Infant Optics
Although the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was actually a rather counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and will not have the ability to tell what is happening unless the monitor is set up somewhere very near the child.
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this instance ).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Samsung Wisenet vs Infant Optics
How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a number of the more current releases in the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that really resembles the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it is tough to dismiss this new kid on the block. Samsung Wisenet vs Infant Optics
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer image of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older version. It’s temperature monitoring, which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which permits you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all its technological advances, there are 2 things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring larger kids that have a lot more movement than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light awake when the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud noises (such as extreme crying), which can be beneficial for customers that are hard of hearing.
Samsung Wisenet vs Infant Optics
As can be expected from a gadget with several features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, pair it with an app that you need to download, etc. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is just one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more prone to hacking or transmission issues, compromising your family’s safety. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency may be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound doesn’t have the same security problems nor the reliance on having to go online.
It can seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we are not denying that it truly does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you’re probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price difference, we are pretty sure the far more affordable Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Samsung Wisenet vs Infant Optics
These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the clear choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how busy your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you would like to use it to communicate with family scattered around the house. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to enable you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.