The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It began as a humble, sound only system that consisted of a mic, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the infant monitors came to adapt complex innovations into their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from purely sound to high definition video recording devices, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto safety, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it is created to do: enable you to look at your baby’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of choices available, we have singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 captured our attention for getting the ideal combination of performance, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Samsung – Sew-3043w vs Infant Optics
Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, such as “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers because of its easy interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors in the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and more than 500,000 sales since its introduction into the market. Samsung – Sew-3043w vs Infant Optics
Both baby monitors are preferred by consumers due to their ease of use at home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents additional reassurance — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Apart from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology that makes both baby monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the world wide web, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for night or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is ideal for viewing the entire nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Samsung – Sew-3043w vs Infant Optics
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it can’t be replaced (and it’s a common fact that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out because of prolonged hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 is conducted on lithium-ion batteries and may be replaced. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the evening.
Last, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even appears off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; and its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it could fall from a table and still be fine.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also maintains a consistent appearance on lists of best baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. While many of their features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 specification that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other features.
Samsung – Sew-3043w vs Infant Optics
In terms of setup, Infant Optics’ easy installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a percentage of their charge every month, so expect to need replacements frequently, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly bigger screen, but the view is quite limited and has to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you would like to see the whole room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there’s some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features Samsung – Sew-3043w vs Infant Optics
Although the Motorola boasts of being able to play 5 lullabies, it was actually a rather counter intuitive function for a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to conceal the baby’s sounds, and won’t be able to tell what is happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very close to the child.
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this case).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Samsung – Sew-3043w vs Infant Optics
How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases in the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that actually looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s tough to dismiss this new kid on the block. Samsung – Sew-3043w vs Infant Optics
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer image of your baby, but unless you’re planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same attributes for a much older version. It has temperature monitoring, which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which permits you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring bigger kids that have much more mobility than in-crib babies. The next is a vibration or LED light alert when the baby-end monitor picks up very loud noises (such as extreme yelling ), which can be beneficial for customers that are hard of hearing.
Samsung – Sew-3043w vs Infant Optics
As can be expected from a gadget with several features, as well as a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to install for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with an app that you will need to download, and so on. As mentioned previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission difficulties, compromising your family’s safety. Since it is dependent on your phone and an online connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency may be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound does not have the same security problems nor the reliance on the Internet.
It can seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we’re not denying that it truly does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price gap, we’re pretty certain the far more affordable Infant Optics does the same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Samsung – Sew-3043w vs Infant Optics
These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we’ve established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the obvious choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how active your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around your home. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to allow you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.