The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, sound only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the baby monitors came to adapt complex innovations in their designs.
Presently, there are baby monitors that range from only audio to high definition video recording apparatuses, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto safety, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it’s created to do: enable you to check your child’s safety and comfort with ease, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of options available, we’ve singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 captured our attention for getting the ideal combination of performance, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Philips Avent Scd630 vs Infant Optics Dxr
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, such as “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers because of its easy interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors on the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and more than 500,000 sales since its introduction to the marketplace. Philips Avent Scd630 vs Infant Optics Dxr
Both baby monitors are favored by customers for their ease of use at home. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents additional peace of mind — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their personal space! Apart from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology that makes both baby monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of undesirable data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for night or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is ideal for viewing the entire nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your infant for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched off and on, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Philips Avent Scd630 vs Infant Optics Dxr
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it’s a common truth that baby monitors tend to burn their batteries out due to prolonged hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 is run on lithium-ion batteries and may be replaced. While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the night.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even looks off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; and its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it could fall from a table and still be fine.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also maintains a consistent presence on lists of baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. Though many of the features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 specification which makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other features.
Philips Avent Scd630 vs Infant Optics Dxr
In terms of installation, Infant Optics’ easy installation can’t be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time necessary for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a percentage of their charge each month, so expect to need replacements often, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is very limited and has to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you want to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there’s some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being adjusted.
No Unnecessary Features Philips Avent Scd630 vs Infant Optics Dxr
Though the Motorola boasts of being able to play 5 lullabies, it was actually a quite counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to conceal the baby’s sounds, and won’t have the ability to tell what is happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very near the child.
In general, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this instance ).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Philips Avent Scd630 vs Infant Optics Dxr
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a number of the more current releases in the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competition that really resembles the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s hard to dismiss this new kid on the block. Philips Avent Scd630 vs Infant Optics Dxr
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you’re planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older version. It has temperature monitoring, which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which allows you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are 2 things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring larger kids that have a lot more mobility than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light awake when the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud sounds (for example, extreme yelling ), which is beneficial for consumers who are hard of hearing.
Philips Avent Scd630 vs Infant Optics Dxr
As may be expected from a gadget with several features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely requires more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with an app that you need to download, and so on. As mentioned previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more prone to hacking or transmission difficulties, compromising your family’s security. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an online connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency might be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound doesn’t have the same security problems nor the reliance on the Internet.
It may look like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we’re not denying that it truly does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are far more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price gap, we are pretty sure the much more affordable Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Philips Avent Scd630 vs Infant Optics Dxr
These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the obvious choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how active your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around the home. At the end of the day, all it must do is to allow you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.