Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr-8

Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr-8

The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, sound only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of a growing number of technologies, the baby monitors came to adapt complex innovations in their designs.

Presently, there are baby monitors that range from only audio to high definition video recording devices, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto safety, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it’s created to do: enable you to check your child’s safety and comfort with ease, at any given time of the day or night.

From the abundance of choices available, we’ve singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for many years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 captured our attention for getting the right mix of performance, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.

Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr-8

 

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr-8

Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.

It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers because of its easy interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors on the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and more than 500,000 sales since its introduction into the marketplace. Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr-8

Features

Security

Both baby monitors are favored by customers for their ease of use in the home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents additional peace of mind — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their private space! Aside from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology that makes both baby monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the world wide web, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.

Interchangeable Lenses

Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for night or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is ideal for viewing the entire nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr-8

infant-optics-dxr-8-different-lenses

Battery Life

Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it is a common truth that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out because of prolonged hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 is run on lithium-ion batteries and can be substituted. While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged into last through the night.

Durability

Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even appears off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; and its antennae are not that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be fine.

 

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL

Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also maintains a consistent presence on lists of best baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. Though many of their features are very similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 specification that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other features.

Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr-8

Installation

Concerning installation, Infant Optics’ simple installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.

Battery Life

On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time necessary for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a proportion of their charge each month, so expect to need replacements frequently, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature changes. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.

Video Feed

With respect to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is very limited and needs to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you want to see the whole room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there’s some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.

infant-optics-dxr-8-01

No Unnecessary Features Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr-8

Though the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was really a quite counter intuitive function for a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to conceal the baby’s sounds, and will not have the ability to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is set up somewhere very close to the child.

Overall, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this case).

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear

Features Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr-8

How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases on the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that really resembles the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s tough to ignore this new kid on the block. Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr-8

However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs from your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.

The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same attributes for a much older model. It’s temperature monitoring, which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which permits you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!

infant-optics-dxr-8-back-pocket

Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert

For all its technological advances, there are 2 things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring larger kids that have much more movement than in-crib babies. The next is a vibration or LED light awake when the baby-end monitor picks up very loud noises (for example, extreme crying), which is beneficial for consumers that are hard of hearing.

Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr-8

Installation

As may be expected from a gadget with multiple features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be harder to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with a program that you will need to download, etc. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is just one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.

Security

Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more prone to hacking or transmission issues, compromising your family’s safety. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency may be an issue. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end audio and video does not have the same security issues nor the reliance on the Internet.

It may seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we’re not denying that it actually does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you’re probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price gap, we’re pretty sure the far cheaper Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.

Conclusion Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr-8

These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we’ve established, Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the obvious choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how active your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you would like to use it to communicate with family scattered around the house. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to enable you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority.

If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.

 

infant-optics-dxr-8-banner

Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr 8

Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr 8

The very first baby monitor was developed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of a growing number of technologies, the baby monitors came to accommodate complex innovations into their designs.

Presently, there are baby monitors that range from purely audio to high definition video recording devices, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto safety, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does what it’s created to do: allow you to look at your child’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.

From the abundance of choices available, we’ve singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for many years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 captured our attention for getting the ideal mix of performance, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.

Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr 8

 

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr 8

Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they have been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.

It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers for its simple interface and dependability. It’s no surprise that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors on the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction into the marketplace. Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr 8

Features

Security

Both baby monitors are favored by consumers due to their ease of use at home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost security, giving parents additional reassurance — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Aside from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology that makes both baby monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.

Interchangeable Lenses

Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is most suitable for night or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is ideal for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched off and on, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr 8

infant-optics-dxr-8-different-lenses

Battery Life

Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it can’t be replaced (and it’s a common truth that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out due to prolonged hours powered ). Infant Optics DXR-8 is conducted on lithium-ion batteries and may be substituted. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the night.

Durability

Last, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even appears off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; and its antennae are not that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it could fall from a table and still be okay.

 

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL

Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent appearance on lists of baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. Though many of the features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 specification which makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.

Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr 8

Installation

Concerning installation, Infant Optics’ easy installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.

Battery Life

On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a proportion of their charge every month, so expect to need replacements frequently, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to drop, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature changes. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.

Video Feed

With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is quite limited and needs to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you would like to see the whole room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.

infant-optics-dxr-8-01

No Unnecessary Features Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr 8

Though the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was actually a quite counter intuitive function for a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and won’t have the ability to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is set up somewhere very near the child.

In general, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this case).

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear

Features Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr 8

How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases on the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competition that actually resembles the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it is hard to dismiss this new kid on the block. Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr 8

However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs from your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.

The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same attributes for a much older model. It’s temperature monitoring, which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which allows you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!

infant-optics-dxr-8-back-pocket

Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert

For all its technological advances, there are 2 things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring larger kids that have much more movement than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light alert if the baby-end monitor picks up very loud sounds (for example, extreme yelling ), which can be beneficial for customers who are hard of hearing.

Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr 8

Installation

As may be expected from a gadget with several features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to install for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, pair it with an app that you need to download, and so on. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.

Security

Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more prone to hacking or transmission issues, endangering your family’s safety. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an online connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency might be an issue. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound does not have the exact same security problems nor the reliance on the Internet.

It may look like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we’re not denying that it truly does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you’re probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are far more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price gap, we’re pretty sure the far cheaper Infant Optics does the same job without hurting your pocket.

Conclusion Nanit vs Infant Optics Dxr 8

These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the clear choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how busy your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around the home. At the end of the day, all it must do is to enable you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority.

If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.

 

infant-optics-dxr-8-banner

error: Content is protected !!