The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It began as a humble, sound only system that consisted of a mic, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the infant monitors came to accommodate complex innovations in their designs.

Now, there are baby monitors that range from only sound to high definition video recording devices, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto safety, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does what it is created to do: enable you to look at your child’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.

From the abundance of choices available, we have singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 captured our attention for getting the ideal mix of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.

Nanit Plus vs Infant Optics Dxr-8

 

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Nanit Plus vs Infant Optics Dxr-8

Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, such as “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.

It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers because of its simple interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors on the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction into the marketplace. Nanit Plus vs Infant Optics Dxr-8

Features

Security

Both baby monitors are favored by customers due to their ease of use at home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost security, giving parents extra peace of mind — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their private space! Apart from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology that makes both infant monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.

Interchangeable Lenses

Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for night or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the entire nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your infant for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched off and on, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Nanit Plus vs Infant Optics Dxr-8

infant-optics-dxr-8-different-lenses

Battery Life

Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it is a common truth that baby monitors tend to burn their batteries out because of prolonged hours powered ). Infant Optics DXR-8 is conducted on lithium-ion batteries and can be replaced. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it has been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the night.

Durability

Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even appears off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; and its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be okay.

 

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL

Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also maintains a consistent presence on lists of best baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. While many of the features are very similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 specification that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other features.

Nanit Plus vs Infant Optics Dxr-8

Installation

Concerning installation, Infant Optics’ simple installation can’t be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.

Battery Life

On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a percentage of their charge each month, so expect to need replacements frequently, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.

Video Feed

With respect to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly bigger screen, but the view is very limited and needs to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you would like to see the whole room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.

infant-optics-dxr-8-01

No Unnecessary Features Nanit Plus vs Infant Optics Dxr-8

Though the Motorola boasts of being able to play 5 lullabies, it was actually a rather counter intuitive function for a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to conceal the baby’s sounds, and will not be able to tell what is happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very close to the child.

Overall, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this case).

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear

Features Nanit Plus vs Infant Optics Dxr-8

How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a number of the more current releases in the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that really resembles the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s tough to dismiss this new kid on the block. Nanit Plus vs Infant Optics Dxr-8

But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.

The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older model. It has temperature monitoring, which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which permits you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!

infant-optics-dxr-8-back-pocket

Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert

For all of its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring larger kids that have much more mobility than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light awake if the baby-end monitor picks up very loud noises (such as extreme yelling ), which can be beneficial for consumers who are hard of hearing.

Nanit Plus vs Infant Optics Dxr-8

Installation

As can be expected from a gadget with multiple features, as well as a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with an app that you need to download, and so on. As mentioned previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is just one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.

Security

Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more prone to hacking or transmission difficulties, compromising your family’s security. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an online connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency might be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end audio and video doesn’t have the same security problems nor the reliance on the Internet.

It can look like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we’re not denying that it actually does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price difference, we are pretty sure the much more affordable Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.

Conclusion Nanit Plus vs Infant Optics Dxr-8

These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we’ve established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the obvious choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how active your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around your home. At the end of the day, all it must do is to enable you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority.

If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.

 

infant-optics-dxr-8-banner