The very first baby monitor was developed in the 30s, accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting. It began as a humble, sound only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the infant monitors came to accommodate complex innovations into their designs.
Presently, there are baby monitors that range from purely audio to high definition video recording apparatuses, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto security, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does what it is created to do: allow you to check your baby’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of options available, we have singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for many years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 grabbed our attention for getting the right combination of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Nanit Monitor vs Infant Optics
Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they have been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers because of its easy interface and dependability. It’s no surprise that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors in the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction to the market. Nanit Monitor vs Infant Optics
Both baby monitors are favored by consumers for their ease of use in the home. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents extra reassurance — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Aside from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both baby monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the world wide web, reducing risks of undesirable data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is most suitable for nighttime or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Nanit Monitor vs Infant Optics
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it’s a frequent truth that baby monitors tend to burn off their batteries out because of prolonged hours powered ). Infant Optics DXR-8 is run on lithium-ion batteries and may be replaced. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged into last through the evening.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even appears off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; and its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it could fall from a table and still be fine.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent appearance on lists of best baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. While many of the features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 specification which makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other features.
Nanit Monitor vs Infant Optics
Concerning setup, Infant Optics’ easy installation can’t be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a percentage of their charge every month, so expect to need replacements often, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature changes. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With respect to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is very limited and has to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you want to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features Nanit Monitor vs Infant Optics
Although the Motorola boasts of being able to play 5 lullabies, it was actually a rather counter intuitive function for a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and will not be able to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is set up somewhere very near the child.
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this instance ).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Nanit Monitor vs Infant Optics
How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a number of the more current releases on the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that really resembles the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it is hard to dismiss this new kid on the block. Nanit Monitor vs Infant Optics
But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs from your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older version. It has temperature monitoring, which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which allows you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring bigger kids that have a lot more mobility than in-crib babies. The next is a vibration or LED light alert when the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud noises (for example, extreme crying), which can be beneficial for customers that are hard of hearing.
Nanit Monitor vs Infant Optics
As may be expected from a gadget with several features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely requires more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with an app that you need to download, etc. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is just one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission difficulties, endangering your family’s security. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an online connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency might be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound does not have the exact same security problems nor the reliance on the Internet.
It can look like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we’re not denying that it truly does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you’re probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price difference, we are pretty sure the far cheaper Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Nanit Monitor vs Infant Optics
All these baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we’ve established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the clear choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how active your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you would like to use it to communicate with family scattered around the home. At the end of the day, all it must do is to enable you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.