The very first baby monitor was developed in the 30s, accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of a growing number of technologies, the baby monitors came to adapt complex innovations in their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from only audio to high definition video recording apparatuses, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto safety, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does what it’s created to do: enable you to check your baby’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of choices available, we have singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 captured our attention for getting the right combination of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Motorola Mbp36s vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they have been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, such as “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers for its easy interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors in the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and more than 500,000 sales since its introduction to the market. Motorola Mbp36s vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
Both baby monitors are favored by customers for their ease of use in the home. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost security, giving parents extra reassurance — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their private space! Aside from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both baby monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of undesirable data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for nighttime or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is ideal for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched off and on, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Motorola Mbp36s vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it’s a frequent truth that baby monitors tend to burn their batteries out due to extended hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 is conducted on lithium-ion batteries and can be substituted. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the night.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even appears off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; and its antennae are not that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be fine.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent presence on lists of baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. While many of the features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 specification that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Motorola Mbp36s vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
Concerning setup, Infant Optics’ simple installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a proportion of their charge each month, so expect to need replacements often, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to drop, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature changes. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is quite limited and has to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you would like to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being adjusted.
No Unnecessary Features Motorola Mbp36s vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
Though the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was really a quite counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to conceal the baby’s sounds, and won’t be able to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very close to the child.
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this instance ).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Motorola Mbp36s vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a number of the more current releases on the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competition that actually looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s tough to dismiss this new kid on the block. Motorola Mbp36s vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you’re planning to make vlogs from your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older model. It has temperature monitoring, which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which permits you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring larger kids that have much more movement than in-crib babies. The next is a vibration or LED light awake if the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud noises (such as extreme yelling ), which can be beneficial for consumers who are hard of hearing.
Motorola Mbp36s vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
As may be expected from a gadget with several features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be harder to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with a program that you will need to download, etc. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission difficulties, endangering your family’s security. Since it is dependent on your phone and an online connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency may be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end audio and video doesn’t have the exact same security issues nor the reliance on the Internet.
It can look like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we are not denying that it truly does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are far more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price difference, we are pretty sure the much cheaper Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Motorola Mbp36s vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
All these baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the clear choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how active your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around your home. At the end of the day, all it must do is to enable you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.