The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting. It began as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a mic, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of a growing number of technologies, the baby monitors came to adapt complex innovations into their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from only audio to high definition video recording devices, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto security, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does what it’s created to do: enable you to check your baby’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of options available, we’ve singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for many years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 grabbed our attention for getting the right combination of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Motorola Mbp36 vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers for its easy interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors on the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction to the market. Motorola Mbp36 vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
Both baby monitors are favored by consumers for their ease of use in the home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents additional peace of mind — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Aside from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both baby monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the world wide web, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for night or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the entire nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your infant for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Motorola Mbp36 vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it can’t be replaced (and it’s a frequent fact that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out because of prolonged hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 is conducted on lithium-ion batteries and may be replaced. While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it has been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged into last through the evening.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even looks off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; and its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be okay.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent appearance on lists of baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. Though many of their features are very similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 specification that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other features.
Motorola Mbp36 vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
Concerning setup, Infant Optics’ simple installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a proportion of their charge each month, so expect to need replacements often, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) is not encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With respect to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is very limited and has to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you want to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there’s some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features Motorola Mbp36 vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
Though the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was actually a quite counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and won’t have the ability to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is set up somewhere very close to the child.
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this instance ).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Motorola Mbp36 vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases in the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competition that really looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it is tough to dismiss this new kid on the block. Motorola Mbp36 vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer image of your baby, but unless you’re planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same attributes for a much older version. It’s temperature monitoring, which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which permits you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring bigger kids that have a lot more mobility than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light awake if the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud sounds (for example, extreme yelling ), which is beneficial for consumers who are hard of hearing.
Motorola Mbp36 vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
As can be expected from a gadget with several features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be harder to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with a program that you need to download, and so on. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is just one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission issues, compromising your family’s security. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an online connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency might be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound doesn’t have the exact same security issues nor the reliance on the Internet.
It may look like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we’re not denying that it truly does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price difference, we’re pretty certain the far more affordable Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Motorola Mbp36 vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
All these baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we’ve established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the clear choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how active your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you would like to use it to communicate with family scattered around your house. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to enable you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.