The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting. It began as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the baby monitors came to adapt complex innovations in their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from only audio to high definition video recording apparatuses, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto safety, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it is created to do: allow you to check your baby’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of choices available, we have singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 grabbed our attention for getting the ideal mix of performance, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Infant Optics vs
Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers for its easy interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors on the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction into the marketplace. Infant Optics vs
Both baby monitors are favored by customers due to their ease of use in the home. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost security, giving parents additional peace of mind — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their private space! Apart from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both infant monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the world wide web, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is most suitable for night or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the entire nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your infant for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched off and on, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Infant Optics vs
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it is a common truth that baby monitors tend to burn off their batteries out due to prolonged hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 is conducted on lithium-ion batteries and may be substituted. While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it has been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the night.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even looks off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; and its antennae are not that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be fine.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent appearance on lists of best baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. While many of their features are very similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 specification which makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Infant Optics vs
In terms of setup, Infant Optics’ simple installation can’t be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a proportion of their charge each month, so expect to need replacements often, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is very limited and has to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you want to see the whole room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features Infant Optics vs
Although the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was really a rather counter intuitive function for a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and won’t be able to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very near the child.
In general, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this instance ).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Infant Optics vs
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases in the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competition that actually resembles the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s tough to ignore this new kid on the block. Infant Optics vs
But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs from your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same attributes for a much older version. It has temperature monitoring, which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which allows you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are 2 things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring bigger kids that have a lot more mobility than in-crib babies. The next is a vibration or LED light awake if the baby-end monitor picks up very loud sounds (for example, extreme crying), which is beneficial for customers who are hard of hearing.
Infant Optics vs
As may be expected from a gadget with multiple features, as well as a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to install for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with a program that you will need to download, etc. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more prone to hacking or transmission difficulties, compromising your family’s safety. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an online connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency may be an issue. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound doesn’t have the same security issues nor the reliance on having to go online.
It can seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we’re not denying that it truly does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you’re probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are far more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price gap, we are pretty sure the much more affordable Infant Optics does the same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics vs
These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the obvious choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how active your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around your home. At the end of the day, all it must do is to enable you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.