The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, sound only system that consisted of a mic, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the infant monitors came to accommodate complex innovations into their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from only audio to high definition video recording devices, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto safety, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it is created to do: enable you to check your child’s safety and comfort with ease, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of options available, we’ve singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 captured our attention for getting the ideal mix of performance, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Infant Optics vs Motorola
Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers because of its simple interface and dependability. It’s no surprise that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors in the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction to the market. Infant Optics vs Motorola
Both baby monitors are favored by consumers due to their ease of use in the home. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents extra reassurance — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their personal space! Apart from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both infant monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the world wide web, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for nighttime or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is ideal for viewing the entire nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your infant for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Infant Optics vs Motorola
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it can’t be replaced (and it is a frequent truth that baby monitors tend to burn off their batteries out because of extended hours powered ). Infant Optics DXR-8 is run on lithium-ion batteries and can be replaced. While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it has been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the evening.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even appears off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; and its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be fine.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent presence on lists of baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. While many of their features are very similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 specification which makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Infant Optics vs Motorola
In terms of installation, Infant Optics’ easy installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a percentage of their charge each month, so expect to need replacements often, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) is not encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature changes. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly bigger screen, but the view is quite limited and needs to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you want to see the whole room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being adjusted.
No Unnecessary Features Infant Optics vs Motorola
Though the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was actually a rather counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and won’t be able to tell what is happening unless the monitor is set up somewhere very close to the child.
In general, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this case).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Infant Optics vs Motorola
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a number of the more current releases in the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that really looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s tough to ignore this new kid on the block. Infant Optics vs Motorola
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you’re planning to make vlogs from your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older version. It’s temperature monitoring, which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which allows you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all its technological advances, there are 2 things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring larger kids that have much more mobility than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light awake when the baby-end monitor picks up very loud noises (such as extreme yelling ), which is beneficial for customers that are hard of hearing.
Infant Optics vs Motorola
As can be expected from a gadget with multiple features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be harder to install for the technologically challenged. It definitely requires more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, pair it with an app that you will need to download, etc. As mentioned previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission issues, endangering your family’s security. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency might be an issue. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound does not have the exact same security issues nor the reliance on having to go online.
It can seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we’re not denying that it truly does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price gap, we are pretty certain the much more affordable Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics vs Motorola
These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the obvious choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how active your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around the home. At the end of the day, all it must do is to enable you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.