The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a mic, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the baby monitors came to adapt complex innovations into their designs.
Presently, there are baby monitors that range from purely audio to high definition video recording apparatuses, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto security, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it’s created to do: enable you to look at your baby’s safety and comfort with ease, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of choices available, we have singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 captured our attention for getting the ideal mix of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Infant Optics vs Lollipop
Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers because of its easy interface and dependability. It’s no surprise that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors in the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and more than 500,000 sales since its introduction to the marketplace. Infant Optics vs Lollipop
Both baby monitors are preferred by consumers for their ease of use at home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents extra reassurance — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Apart from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both baby monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is most suitable for night or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is ideal for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Infant Optics vs Lollipop
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it’s a common fact that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out because of extended hours powered ). Infant Optics DXR-8 is run on lithium-ion batteries and may be replaced. While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it has been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the night.
Last, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even appears off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; and its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be okay.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also maintains a consistent appearance on lists of best baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. While many of the features are very similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 specification that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Infant Optics vs Lollipop
In terms of installation, Infant Optics’ easy installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a percentage of their charge every month, so expect to need replacements frequently, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) is not encouraged. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With respect to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is quite limited and has to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you want to see the whole room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features Infant Optics vs Lollipop
Although the Motorola boasts of being able to play 5 lullabies, it was actually a rather counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and will not be able to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is set up somewhere very near the child.
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this instance ).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Infant Optics vs Lollipop
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases on the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that really resembles the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it is hard to ignore this new kid on the block. Infant Optics vs Lollipop
But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer image of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same attributes for a much older version. It has temperature monitoring, which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which allows you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring bigger kids that have much more movement than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light awake when the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud noises (for example, extreme yelling ), which is beneficial for consumers who are hard of hearing.
Infant Optics vs Lollipop
As can be expected from a gadget with multiple features, as well as a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to install for the technologically challenged. It definitely requires more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, pair it with an app that you need to download, and so on. As mentioned previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is just one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission difficulties, endangering your family’s safety. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency may be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end audio and video does not have the same security issues nor the reliance on the Internet.
It may look like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we are not denying that it truly does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are far more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price difference, we are pretty certain the much cheaper Infant Optics does the same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics vs Lollipop
All these baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the obvious choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how active your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you would like to use it to communicate with family scattered around the house. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to enable you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.