The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the baby monitors came to accommodate complex innovations in their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from purely sound to high definition video recording devices, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto security, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does what it’s created to do: allow you to look at your child’s safety and comfort with ease, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of choices available, we’ve singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for many years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 captured our attention for getting the ideal mix of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Vava
Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they have been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers for its easy interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors in the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and more than 500,000 sales since its introduction into the marketplace. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Vava
Both baby monitors are favored by consumers due to their ease of use at home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents extra reassurance — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Aside from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both infant monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of undesirable data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is most suitable for night or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched off and on, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Vava
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it can’t be replaced (and it’s a common truth that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out because of prolonged hours powered ). Infant Optics DXR-8 is run on lithium-ion batteries and may be replaced. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it has been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the evening.
Last, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even looks off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; and its antennae are not that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it could fall from a table and still be okay.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent appearance on lists of best baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. Though many of the features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 specification that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other features.
Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Vava
In terms of setup, Infant Optics’ simple installation can’t be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a percentage of their charge each month, so expect to need replacements frequently, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) is not encouraged. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to drop, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature changes. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With respect to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly bigger screen, but the view is very limited and has to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you would like to see the whole room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being adjusted.
No Unnecessary Features Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Vava
Though the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was actually a rather counter intuitive function for a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to conceal the baby’s sounds, and won’t have the ability to tell what is happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very near the child.
In general, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this case).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Vava
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases in the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that actually resembles the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it is hard to dismiss this new kid on the block. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Vava
But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older model. It’s temperature monitoring, which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which permits you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all its technological advances, there are 2 things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring larger kids that have much more mobility than in-crib babies. The next is a vibration or LED light alert when the baby-end monitor picks up very loud sounds (for example, extreme crying), which can be beneficial for customers who are hard of hearing.
Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Vava
As may be expected from a gadget with several features, as well as a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be harder to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely requires more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with a program that you need to download, etc. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission difficulties, compromising your family’s security. Since it is dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency might be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end audio and video does not have the same security problems nor the reliance on the Internet.
It may seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we’re not denying that it truly does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you’re probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price gap, we’re pretty certain the much more affordable Infant Optics does the same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Vava
These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we’ve established, Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the clear choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how active your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around your house. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to allow you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.