The very first baby monitor was developed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It began as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of a growing number of technologies, the infant monitors came to adapt complex innovations into their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from purely sound to high definition video recording apparatuses, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto safety, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it is created to do: allow you to look at your baby’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of choices available, we’ve singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 captured our attention for getting the right combination of performance, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Samsung Sew-3043w
Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they have been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, such as “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers for its easy interface and dependability. It’s no surprise that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors in the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction to the market. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Samsung Sew-3043w
Both baby monitors are preferred by customers due to their ease of use at home. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost security, giving parents extra peace of mind — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Apart from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology that makes both baby monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the world wide web, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for night or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Samsung Sew-3043w
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it can’t be replaced (and it is a common truth that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out because of prolonged hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 is conducted on lithium-ion batteries and can be replaced. While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it has been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the evening.
Last, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even looks off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; and its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be fine.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also maintains a consistent presence on lists of baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. Though many of the features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 specification that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Samsung Sew-3043w
In terms of installation, Infant Optics’ simple installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a percentage of their charge each month, so expect to need replacements often, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) is not encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With respect to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly bigger screen, but the view is quite limited and has to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you would like to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there’s some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being adjusted.
No Unnecessary Features Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Samsung Sew-3043w
Though the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was actually a quite counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to conceal the baby’s sounds, and won’t be able to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very near the child.
In general, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this instance ).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Samsung Sew-3043w
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a number of the more current releases in the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competition that really looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s hard to ignore this new kid on the block. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Samsung Sew-3043w
But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same attributes for a much older version. It has temperature monitoring, which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which permits you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are 2 things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring larger kids that have a lot more movement than in-crib babies. The next is a vibration or LED light awake when the baby-end monitor picks up very loud sounds (for example, extreme crying), which can be beneficial for consumers that are hard of hearing.
Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Samsung Sew-3043w
As may be expected from a gadget with several features, as well as a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be harder to install for the technologically challenged. It definitely requires more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with a program that you will need to download, etc. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is just one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more prone to hacking or transmission issues, compromising your family’s security. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an online connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency might be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound doesn’t have the same security problems nor the reliance on having to go online.
It can look like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we are not denying that it truly does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price gap, we are pretty sure the much more affordable Infant Optics does the same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Samsung Sew-3043w
All these baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the clear choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how busy your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around the house. At the end of the day, all it must do is to allow you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.