The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting. It began as a humble, sound only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the baby monitors came to adapt complex innovations into their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from only audio to high definition video recording devices, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto security, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does what it’s created to do: allow you to look at your baby’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of options available, we have singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for many years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 captured our attention for getting the right combination of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Owlet
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they have been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers because of its simple interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors in the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction to the market. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Owlet
Both baby monitors are preferred by consumers for their ease of use in the home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents additional reassurance — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Aside from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology that makes both infant monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is most suitable for nighttime or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Owlet
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it’s a common truth that baby monitors tend to burn their batteries out because of extended hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 is run on lithium-ion batteries and can be replaced. While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the evening.
Last, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even appears off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; and its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be fine.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent appearance on lists of baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. Though many of the features are very similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 specification that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Owlet
In terms of setup, Infant Optics’ simple installation can’t be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time necessary for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a proportion of their charge each month, so expect to need replacements often, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) is not encouraged. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature changes. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With respect to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is very limited and needs to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you would like to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there’s some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Owlet
Although the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was really a quite counter intuitive function for a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and will not be able to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very near the child.
In general, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this instance ).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Owlet
How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a number of the more current releases in the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that actually looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s hard to ignore this new kid on the block. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Owlet
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer image of your baby, but unless you’re planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same attributes for a much older version. It’s temperature monitoring, which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which allows you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring bigger kids that have a lot more movement than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light alert when the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud noises (such as extreme yelling ), which is beneficial for customers that are hard of hearing.
Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Owlet
As may be expected from a gadget with several features, as well as a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be harder to install for the technologically challenged. It definitely requires more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with an app that you will need to download, etc. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission difficulties, endangering your family’s security. Since it is dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency might be an issue. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end audio and video doesn’t have the same security problems nor the reliance on having to go online.
It may look like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we’re not denying that it actually does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price gap, we’re pretty sure the far cheaper Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Owlet
All these baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the clear choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how active your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around the house. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to allow you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.