The very first baby monitor was developed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It began as a humble, sound only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the baby monitors came to accommodate complex innovations into their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from only audio to high definition video recording apparatuses, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto safety, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it’s created to do: enable you to look at your baby’s safety and comfort with ease, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of choices available, we have singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for many years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 grabbed our attention for getting the ideal mix of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, such as “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers because of its simple interface and dependability. It’s no surprise that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors on the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction into the marketplace. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest
Both baby monitors are preferred by customers due to their ease of use in the home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents extra reassurance — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their personal space! Apart from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both infant monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of undesirable data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for nighttime or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched off and on, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it is a frequent fact that infant monitors tend to burn off their batteries out because of prolonged hours powered ). Infant Optics DXR-8 is run on lithium-ion batteries and can be replaced. While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the night.
Last, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even looks off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; and its antennae are not that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it could fall from a table and still be okay.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent appearance on lists of baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. While many of the features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 specification that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other features.
Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest
Concerning installation, Infant Optics’ easy installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a proportion of their charge every month, so expect to need replacements frequently, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) is not encouraged. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature changes. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is very limited and needs to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you want to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there’s some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest
Though the Motorola boasts of being able to play 5 lullabies, it was actually a quite counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and will not have the ability to tell what is happening unless the monitor is set up somewhere very close to the child.
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this case).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest
How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a number of the more current releases on the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competition that really resembles the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it is tough to dismiss this new kid on the block. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you’re planning to make vlogs from your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same attributes for a much older model. It’s temperature monitoring, which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which permits you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are 2 things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring larger kids that have much more movement than in-crib babies. The next is a vibration or LED light alert when the baby-end monitor picks up very loud sounds (such as extreme yelling ), which can be beneficial for customers that are hard of hearing.
Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest
As may be expected from a gadget with multiple features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be harder to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, pair it with an app that you will need to download, and so on. As mentioned previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission issues, compromising your family’s security. Since it is dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency might be an issue. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound does not have the exact same security problems nor the reliance on having to go online.
It may seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we are not denying that it actually does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price difference, we are pretty certain the far cheaper Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest
These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we’ve established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the obvious choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how active your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you would like to use it to communicate with family scattered around your house. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to enable you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.