The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It began as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a mic, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of a growing number of technologies, the infant monitors came to accommodate complex innovations into their designs.

Now, there are baby monitors that range from only sound to high definition video recording devices, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto safety, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it’s created to do: enable you to look at your child’s safety and comfort with ease, at any given time of the day or night.

From the abundance of choices available, we have singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for many years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 captured our attention for getting the ideal mix of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.

Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest Cam

 

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest Cam

Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, such as “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.

It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers because of its simple interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors in the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and more than 500,000 sales since its introduction into the market. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest Cam

Features

Security

Both baby monitors are favored by consumers due to their ease of use at home. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents extra reassurance — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their personal space! Apart from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both baby monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the world wide web, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.

Interchangeable Lenses

Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for nighttime or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the entire nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest Cam

infant-optics-dxr-8-different-lenses

Battery Life

Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it is a frequent truth that baby monitors tend to burn their batteries out due to prolonged hours powered ). Infant Optics DXR-8 is conducted on lithium-ion batteries and may be substituted. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the evening.

Durability

Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even looks off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; and its antennae are not that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be fine.

 

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL

Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent presence on lists of baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. While many of the features are very similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 specification that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.

Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest Cam

Installation

Concerning setup, Infant Optics’ easy installation can’t be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.

Battery Life

On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a percentage of their charge each month, so expect to need replacements often, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to drop, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature changes. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.

Video Feed

With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is quite limited and has to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you would like to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.

infant-optics-dxr-8-01

No Unnecessary Features Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest Cam

Although the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was actually a rather counter intuitive function for a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and won’t have the ability to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very near the child.

Overall, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this instance ).

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear

Features Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest Cam

How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases in the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competition that really looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s tough to ignore this new kid on the block. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest Cam

But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.

The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older version. It has temperature monitoring, which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which allows you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!

infant-optics-dxr-8-back-pocket

Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert

For all of its technological advances, there are 2 things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring bigger kids that have much more mobility than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light alert if the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud noises (such as extreme yelling ), which is beneficial for consumers who are hard of hearing.

Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest Cam

Installation

As may be expected from a gadget with several features, as well as a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely requires more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with a program that you will need to download, etc. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is just one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.

Security

Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission issues, compromising your family’s safety. Since it is dependent on your phone and an online connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency may be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound doesn’t have the exact same security problems nor the reliance on having to go online.

It may seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we’re not denying that it actually does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you’re probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price gap, we’re pretty sure the far cheaper Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.

Conclusion Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Nest Cam

All these baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the obvious choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how busy your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around the home. At the end of the day, all it must do is to enable you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority.

If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.

 

infant-optics-dxr-8-banner