The very first baby monitor was developed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It began as a humble, sound only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the infant monitors came to accommodate complex innovations into their designs.

Now, there are baby monitors that range from purely audio to high definition video recording devices, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto security, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it is created to do: enable you to check your child’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.

From the abundance of choices available, we’ve singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for many years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 grabbed our attention for getting the ideal combination of performance, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.

Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola

 

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola

Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, such as “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.

It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers for its simple interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors on the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and more than 500,000 sales since its introduction into the marketplace. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola

Features

Security

Both baby monitors are favored by consumers due to their ease of use in the home. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost security, giving parents additional reassurance — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their private space! Aside from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both baby monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.

Interchangeable Lenses

Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for night or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is ideal for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched off and on, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola

infant-optics-dxr-8-different-lenses

Battery Life

Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it’s a common truth that baby monitors tend to burn off their batteries out because of extended hours powered ). Infant Optics DXR-8 is run on lithium-ion batteries and can be substituted. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged into last through the evening.

Durability

Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even appears off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; and its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it could fall from a table and still be fine.

 

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL

Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also maintains a consistent appearance on lists of baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. Though many of the features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 specification which makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.

Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola

Installation

Concerning setup, Infant Optics’ easy installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.

Battery Life

On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a percentage of their charge every month, so expect to need replacements often, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.

Video Feed

With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly bigger screen, but the view is very limited and has to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you would like to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there’s some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.

infant-optics-dxr-8-01

No Unnecessary Features Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola

Though the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was actually a quite counter intuitive function for a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to conceal the baby’s sounds, and will not be able to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is set up somewhere very close to the child.

In general, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this instance ).

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear

Features Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola

How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases in the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that actually looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it is hard to dismiss this new kid on the block. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola

However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.

The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older version. It’s temperature monitoring, which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which permits you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!

infant-optics-dxr-8-back-pocket

Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert

For all its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring larger kids that have a lot more mobility than in-crib babies. The next is a vibration or LED light alert when the baby-end monitor picks up very loud sounds (such as extreme crying), which can be beneficial for consumers who are hard of hearing.

Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola

Installation

As can be expected from a gadget with multiple features, as well as a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely requires more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with an app that you will need to download, and so on. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.

Security

Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission difficulties, compromising your family’s safety. Since it is dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency may be an issue. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end audio and video doesn’t have the exact same security issues nor the reliance on having to go online.

It can seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we are not denying that it truly does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are far more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price gap, we are pretty sure the far more affordable Infant Optics does the same job without hurting your pocket.

Conclusion Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola

All these baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we’ve established, Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the obvious choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how busy your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around your house. At the end of the day, all it must do is to allow you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority.

If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.

 

infant-optics-dxr-8-banner