The very first baby monitor was developed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a mic, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of a growing number of technologies, the infant monitors came to accommodate complex innovations in their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from only audio to high definition video recording apparatuses, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto security, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does what it’s created to do: allow you to check your child’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of options available, we have singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 captured our attention for getting the right mix of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola Mbp43
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, such as “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers because of its simple interface and dependability. It’s no surprise that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors on the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and more than 500,000 sales since its introduction to the market. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola Mbp43
Both baby monitors are favored by customers for their ease of use in the home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost security, giving parents additional peace of mind — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their personal space! Apart from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology that makes both baby monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of undesirable data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for nighttime or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your infant for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola Mbp43
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it can’t be replaced (and it is a frequent fact that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out due to prolonged hours powered ). Infant Optics DXR-8 is conducted on lithium-ion batteries and may be substituted. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it has been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged into last through the night.
Last, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even looks off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; and its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be fine.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent appearance on lists of baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. Though many of their features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 specification which makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other features.
Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola Mbp43
In terms of installation, Infant Optics’ easy installation can’t be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a proportion of their charge every month, so expect to need replacements often, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is quite limited and has to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you want to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there’s some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being adjusted.
No Unnecessary Features Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola Mbp43
Although the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was really a rather counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to conceal the baby’s sounds, and will not have the ability to tell what is happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very near the child.
In general, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this instance ).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola Mbp43
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases on the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that actually resembles the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s hard to ignore this new kid on the block. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola Mbp43
But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you’re planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older model. It’s temperature monitoring, which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which permits you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring larger kids that have a lot more mobility than in-crib babies. The next is a vibration or LED light awake if the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud sounds (such as extreme crying), which is beneficial for consumers that are hard of hearing.
Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola Mbp43
As can be expected from a gadget with several features, as well as a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with a program that you need to download, etc. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more prone to hacking or transmission issues, endangering your family’s safety. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency may be an issue. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end audio and video does not have the same security problems nor the reliance on having to go online.
It can look like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we are not denying that it truly does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are far more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price difference, we’re pretty sure the much more affordable Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola Mbp43
All these baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the obvious choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how active your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you would like to use it to communicate with family scattered around the home. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to allow you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.