The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, sound only system that consisted of a mic, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of a growing number of technologies, the baby monitors came to adapt complex innovations in their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from purely audio to high definition video recording devices, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto safety, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does what it’s created to do: enable you to check your child’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of choices available, we’ve singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 grabbed our attention for getting the ideal combination of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they have been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers because of its easy interface and dependability. It’s no surprise that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors on the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and more than 500,000 sales since its introduction to the market. Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Both baby monitors are favored by customers due to their ease of use in the home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents additional peace of mind — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Apart from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology that makes both baby monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for night or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the entire nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your infant for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched off and on, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it is a common truth that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out because of prolonged hours powered ). Infant Optics DXR-8 is conducted on lithium-ion batteries and can be substituted. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it has been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the evening.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even appears off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; and its antennae are not that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it could fall from a table and still be fine.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent appearance on lists of best baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. While many of their features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 specification which makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other features.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Concerning setup, Infant Optics’ easy installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a proportion of their charge every month, so expect to need replacements frequently, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to drop, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature changes. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is quite limited and has to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you would like to see the whole room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there’s some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Though the Motorola boasts of being able to play 5 lullabies, it was actually a rather counter intuitive function for a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to conceal the baby’s sounds, and won’t be able to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very close to the child.
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this instance ).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a number of the more current releases in the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competition that actually resembles the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s tough to ignore this new kid on the block. Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer image of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older model. It’s temperature monitoring, which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which permits you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all its technological advances, there are 2 things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring bigger kids that have a lot more mobility than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light alert if the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud sounds (for example, extreme yelling ), which is beneficial for customers who are hard of hearing.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
As may be expected from a gadget with several features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with a program that you will need to download, and so on. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is just one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission issues, compromising your family’s safety. Since it is dependent on your phone and an online connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency may be an issue. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound doesn’t have the exact same security problems nor the reliance on the Internet.
It can seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we are not denying that it actually does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price difference, we’re pretty sure the much cheaper Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the clear choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how active your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you would like to use it to communicate with family scattered around the house. At the end of the day, all it must do is to allow you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.