The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of a growing number of technologies, the baby monitors came to adapt complex innovations in their designs.
Presently, there are baby monitors that range from purely audio to high definition video recording apparatuses, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto security, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it’s created to do: enable you to check your baby’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of options available, we have singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 grabbed our attention for getting the ideal mix of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola Mbp36s
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they have been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers for its easy interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors in the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and more than 500,000 sales since its introduction to the market. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola Mbp36s
Both baby monitors are favored by consumers due to their ease of use at home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents extra peace of mind — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Apart from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both baby monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the world wide web, reducing risks of undesirable data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for nighttime or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is ideal for viewing the entire nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola Mbp36s
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it can’t be replaced (and it’s a common fact that infant monitors tend to burn off their batteries out due to prolonged hours powered ). Infant Optics DXR-8 is conducted on lithium-ion batteries and can be substituted. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it has been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged into last through the evening.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even appears off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; and its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it could fall from a table and still be fine.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent presence on lists of best baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. While many of their features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 specification which makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola Mbp36s
Concerning setup, Infant Optics’ easy installation can’t be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time necessary for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a percentage of their charge each month, so expect to need replacements frequently, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to drop, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With respect to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly bigger screen, but the view is very limited and has to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you want to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there’s some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being adjusted.
No Unnecessary Features Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola Mbp36s
Though the Motorola boasts of being able to play 5 lullabies, it was really a quite counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to conceal the baby’s sounds, and won’t have the ability to tell what is happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very near the child.
In general, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this instance ).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola Mbp36s
How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a number of the more current releases on the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that actually resembles the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s hard to dismiss this new kid on the block. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola Mbp36s
But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older model. It has temperature monitoring, which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which permits you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring larger kids that have much more movement than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light alert if the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud noises (for example, extreme yelling ), which can be beneficial for consumers who are hard of hearing.
Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola Mbp36s
As may be expected from a gadget with multiple features, as well as a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be harder to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely requires more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, pair it with an app that you will need to download, etc. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is just one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more prone to hacking or transmission difficulties, endangering your family’s security. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an online connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency may be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound does not have the same security problems nor the reliance on the Internet.
It can look like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we are not denying that it truly does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you’re probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are far more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price difference, we’re pretty certain the far cheaper Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Motorola Mbp36s
These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the clear choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how busy your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you would like to use it to communicate with family scattered around your house. At the end of the day, all it must do is to enable you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.