The very first baby monitor was developed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the baby monitors came to accommodate complex innovations into their designs.

Presently, there are baby monitors that range from only sound to high definition video recording devices, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto safety, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does what it is created to do: allow you to look at your child’s safety and comfort with ease, at any given time of the day or night.

From the abundance of options available, we have singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 captured our attention for getting the ideal combination of performance, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.

Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Levana

 

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Levana

Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, such as “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.

It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers because of its easy interface and dependability. It’s no surprise that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors in the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction into the market. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Levana

Features

Security

Both baby monitors are favored by consumers due to their ease of use in the home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents extra peace of mind — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Apart from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology that makes both baby monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of undesirable data transmission.

Interchangeable Lenses

Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for nighttime or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is ideal for viewing the entire nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched off and on, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Levana

infant-optics-dxr-8-different-lenses

Battery Life

Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it is a common fact that infant monitors tend to burn off their batteries out because of prolonged hours powered ). Infant Optics DXR-8 is run on lithium-ion batteries and may be replaced. While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged into last through the evening.

Durability

Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even looks off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; and its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be fine.

 

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL

Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent appearance on lists of baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. While many of the features are very similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 specification that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other features.

Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Levana

Installation

In terms of installation, Infant Optics’ easy installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.

Battery Life

On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time necessary for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a percentage of their charge each month, so expect to need replacements often, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.

Video Feed

With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly bigger screen, but the view is very limited and needs to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you would like to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.

infant-optics-dxr-8-01

No Unnecessary Features Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Levana

Although the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was really a rather counter intuitive function for a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and will not have the ability to tell what is happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very near the child.

In general, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this instance ).

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear

Features Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Levana

How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a number of the more current releases on the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competition that really looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it is tough to dismiss this new kid on the block. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Levana

However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs from your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.

The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older version. It’s temperature monitoring, which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which permits you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!

infant-optics-dxr-8-back-pocket

Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert

For all its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring bigger kids that have much more mobility than in-crib babies. The next is a vibration or LED light awake if the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud noises (for example, extreme yelling ), which can be beneficial for customers that are hard of hearing.

Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Levana

Installation

As may be expected from a gadget with several features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely requires more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with an app that you need to download, and so on. As mentioned previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is just one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.

Security

Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission issues, compromising your family’s safety. Since it is dependent on your phone and an online connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency might be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound does not have the exact same security problems nor the reliance on having to go online.

It can look like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we’re not denying that it actually does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price difference, we’re pretty sure the much cheaper Infant Optics does the same job without hurting your pocket.

Conclusion Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Levana

These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the clear choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how active your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around the home. At the end of the day, all it must do is to enable you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority.

If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.

 

infant-optics-dxr-8-banner