The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a mic, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of a growing number of technologies, the baby monitors came to accommodate complex innovations in their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from purely sound to high definition video recording devices, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto security, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it’s created to do: allow you to look at your child’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of options available, we’ve singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 captured our attention for getting the ideal mix of performance, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Dxr 5
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they have been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, such as “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers for its easy interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors on the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction into the market. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Dxr 5
Both baby monitors are preferred by customers for their ease of use in the home. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents additional peace of mind — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their personal space! Apart from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both infant monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is most suitable for nighttime or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the entire nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Dxr 5
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it’s a frequent truth that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out because of prolonged hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 is run on lithium-ion batteries and can be substituted. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged into last through the night.
Last, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even appears off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; and its antennae are not that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it could fall from a table and still be fine.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also maintains a consistent presence on lists of baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. Though many of their features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 specification that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Dxr 5
In terms of installation, Infant Optics’ simple installation can’t be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time necessary for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a proportion of their charge each month, so expect to need replacements often, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to drop, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly bigger screen, but the view is very limited and needs to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you would like to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Dxr 5
Although the Motorola boasts of being able to play 5 lullabies, it was really a rather counter intuitive function for a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and won’t be able to tell what is happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very close to the child.
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this case).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Dxr 5
How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases in the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that really looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s tough to dismiss this new kid on the block. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Dxr 5
But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same features for a much older model. It has temperature monitoring, which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which allows you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all its technological advances, there are 2 things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring larger kids that have much more movement than in-crib babies. The next is a vibration or LED light awake if the baby-end monitor picks up very loud sounds (for example, extreme yelling ), which can be beneficial for consumers who are hard of hearing.
Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Dxr 5
As may be expected from a gadget with multiple features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely requires more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, pair it with an app that you need to download, etc. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is just one reason why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more prone to hacking or transmission issues, endangering your family’s safety. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an online connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency might be an issue. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound does not have the exact same security issues nor the reliance on the Internet.
It can look like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we are not denying that it actually does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you’re probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are far more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price gap, we’re pretty sure the far cheaper Infant Optics does the exact same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Dxr 5
These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the clear choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how active your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around the home. At the end of the day, all it must do is to allow you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.