The very first baby monitor was developed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of a growing number of technologies, the infant monitors came to adapt complex innovations into their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from only audio to high definition video recording apparatuses, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto security, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it is created to do: enable you to look at your baby’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of choices available, we’ve singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 grabbed our attention for getting the right combination of performance, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Dx R 5
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers for its easy interface and dependability. It’s no surprise that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors in the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction into the marketplace. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Dx R 5
Both baby monitors are preferred by customers due to their ease of use in the home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents additional peace of mind — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their private space! Apart from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology that makes both infant monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the world wide web, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is most suitable for night or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the entire nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Dx R 5
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it can’t be replaced (and it is a frequent truth that infant monitors tend to burn off their batteries out because of prolonged hours powered ). Infant Optics DXR-8 is run on lithium-ion batteries and may be substituted. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the evening.
Last, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels fragile, and even looks off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; and its antennae are not that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it could fall from a table and still be fine.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also maintains a consistent presence on lists of best baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. While many of their features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 specification that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Dx R 5
Concerning setup, Infant Optics’ simple installation can’t be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a percentage of their charge every month, so expect to need replacements frequently, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) is not encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly bigger screen, but the view is quite limited and needs to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you would like to see the whole room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there’s some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being adjusted.
No Unnecessary Features Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Dx R 5
Although the Motorola boasts of being able to play 5 lullabies, it was really a quite counter intuitive function for a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and will not have the ability to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is set up somewhere very close to the child.
In general, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this instance ).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Dx R 5
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a number of the more current releases on the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competition that actually resembles the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it is hard to ignore this new kid on the block. Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Dx R 5
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer image of your baby, but unless you’re planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same attributes for a much older model. It’s temperature monitoring, which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which allows you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all its technological advances, there are 2 things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring larger kids that have much more mobility than in-crib babies. The next is a vibration or LED light awake when the baby-end monitor picks up very loud noises (such as extreme crying), which is beneficial for consumers that are hard of hearing.
Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Dx R 5
As can be expected from a gadget with several features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to install for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, pair it with an app that you need to download, and so on. As mentioned previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is just one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more prone to hacking or transmission difficulties, endangering your family’s security. Since it is dependent on your phone and an online connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency might be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound doesn’t have the same security problems nor the reliance on having to go online.
It can look like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we are not denying that it actually does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price difference, we are pretty sure the much more affordable Infant Optics does the same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics Dxr-8 vs Dx R 5
These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we’ve established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the clear choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how busy your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around your home. At the end of the day, all it must do is to enable you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.