The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the infant monitors came to accommodate complex innovations in their designs.

Now, there are baby monitors that range from only audio to high definition video recording devices, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto security, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it’s created to do: allow you to check your baby’s safety and comfort with ease, at any given time of the day or night.

From the abundance of choices available, we’ve singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for many years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 captured our attention for getting the ideal mix of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby

 

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby

Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they have been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.

It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers for its easy interface and dependability. It’s no surprise that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors on the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction to the marketplace. Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby

Features

Security

Both baby monitors are favored by consumers for their ease of use in the home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents extra peace of mind — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Aside from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology that makes both infant monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of undesirable data transmission.

Interchangeable Lenses

Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is most suitable for nighttime or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is ideal for viewing the entire nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your infant for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby

infant-optics-dxr-8-different-lenses

Battery Life

Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it is a frequent truth that infant monitors tend to burn off their batteries out because of extended hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 is run on lithium-ion batteries and can be substituted. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged into last through the evening.

Durability

Last, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even looks off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; and its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be okay.

 

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL

Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent presence on lists of baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. Though many of their features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 specification that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other features.

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby

Installation

Concerning installation, Infant Optics’ easy installation can’t be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.

Battery Life

On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a proportion of their charge every month, so expect to need replacements frequently, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to drop, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature changes. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.

Video Feed

With respect to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is very limited and needs to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you want to see the whole room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being adjusted.

infant-optics-dxr-8-01

No Unnecessary Features Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby

Although the Motorola boasts of having the ability to play 5 lullabies, it was really a quite counter intuitive function for a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to conceal the baby’s sounds, and won’t have the ability to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very near the child.

Overall, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this instance ).

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear

Features Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby

How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a number of the more current releases in the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competition that really resembles the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s tough to dismiss this new kid on the block. Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby

But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer image of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs from your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.

The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same attributes for a much older version. It has temperature monitoring, which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which allows you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!

infant-optics-dxr-8-back-pocket

Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert

For all of its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring larger kids that have a lot more mobility than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light alert if the baby-end monitor picks up very loud noises (such as extreme crying), which can be beneficial for customers that are hard of hearing.

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby

Installation

As may be expected from a gadget with multiple features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be harder to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with a program that you need to download, and so on. As mentioned previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is just one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.

Security

Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission issues, endangering your family’s safety. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency may be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end audio and video does not have the same security problems nor the reliance on having to go online.

It can look like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we are not denying that it actually does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price difference, we are pretty certain the much cheaper Infant Optics does the same job without hurting your pocket.

Conclusion Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby

All these baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the obvious choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how active your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around your home. At the end of the day, all it must do is to allow you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority.

If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.

 

infant-optics-dxr-8-banner