The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting. It began as a humble, sound only system that consisted of a mic, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the infant monitors came to adapt complex innovations in their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from only audio to high definition video recording apparatuses, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto security, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it is created to do: allow you to check your child’s safety and comfort without difficulty, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of options available, we have singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for many years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 captured our attention for getting the right mix of performance, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Infant Optics Dxr-5 vs Dxr-8
Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they have been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers because of its easy interface and dependability. It’s no surprise that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors on the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and more than 500,000 sales since its introduction into the market. Infant Optics Dxr-5 vs Dxr-8
Both baby monitors are preferred by customers due to their ease of use in the home. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost security, giving parents extra reassurance — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their personal space! Apart from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both infant monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the world wide web, reducing risks of undesirable data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is most suitable for nighttime or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched off and on, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Infant Optics Dxr-5 vs Dxr-8
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it is a frequent truth that baby monitors tend to burn their batteries out because of prolonged hours powered on). Infant Optics DXR-8 is conducted on lithium-ion batteries and can be replaced. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it has been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the evening.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even appears off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; and its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be okay.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also maintains a consistent appearance on lists of best baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. While many of their features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 specification that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Infant Optics Dxr-5 vs Dxr-8
In terms of setup, Infant Optics’ simple installation can’t be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a proportion of their charge every month, so expect to need replacements often, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is very limited and has to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you would like to see the whole room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being adjusted.
No Unnecessary Features Infant Optics Dxr-5 vs Dxr-8
Although the Motorola boasts of being able to play 5 lullabies, it was really a quite counter intuitive function for a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and will not be able to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very close to the child.
In general, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this case).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Infant Optics Dxr-5 vs Dxr-8
How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a number of the more current releases in the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competition that actually looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s tough to dismiss this new kid on the block. Infant Optics Dxr-5 vs Dxr-8
But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer image of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs out of your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same attributes for a much older version. It’s temperature monitoring, which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which allows you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all of its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the much simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring larger kids that have a lot more mobility than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light awake if the baby-end monitor picks up very loud sounds (for example, extreme crying), which can be beneficial for consumers who are hard of hearing.
Infant Optics Dxr-5 vs Dxr-8
As may be expected from a gadget with several features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to install for the technologically challenged. It definitely requires more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with an app that you need to download, etc. As mentioned previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is just one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission issues, endangering your family’s safety. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an online connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency might be an issue. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end audio and video doesn’t have the same security issues nor the reliance on having to go online.
It can seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we’re not denying that it actually does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you’re probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are far more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price gap, we are pretty certain the far cheaper Infant Optics does the same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics Dxr-5 vs Dxr-8
These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the obvious choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how active your baby is (or how busy you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around the home. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to allow you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.