The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a mic, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the infant monitors came to accommodate complex innovations into their designs.
Presently, there are baby monitors that range from only sound to high definition video recording devices, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto security, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it is created to do: enable you to check your baby’s safety and comfort with ease, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of options available, we’ve singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 captured our attention for getting the ideal mix of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Infant Optics Camera vs Scan
Possibly the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, such as “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers because of its easy interface and dependability. It’s no surprise that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors in the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and over 500,000 sales since its introduction into the marketplace. Infant Optics Camera vs Scan
Both baby monitors are preferred by consumers due to their ease of use in the home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents extra reassurance — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their personal space! Aside from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both baby monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the world wide web, reducing risks of undesirable data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for nighttime or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched off and on, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Infant Optics Camera vs Scan
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it can’t be replaced (and it is a common fact that baby monitors tend to burn their batteries out due to prolonged hours powered ). Infant Optics DXR-8 is conducted on lithium-ion batteries and may be replaced. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the evening.
Last, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even looks off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; and its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be okay.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also makes a consistent presence on lists of best baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. While many of the features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 specification that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Infant Optics Camera vs Scan
Concerning installation, Infant Optics’ easy installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a percentage of their charge every month, so expect to need replacements often, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) is not encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to drop, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With respect to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly bigger screen, but the view is very limited and has to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you want to see the whole room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there’s some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.
No Unnecessary Features Infant Optics Camera vs Scan
Although the Motorola boasts of being able to play 5 lullabies, it was actually a quite counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and will not be able to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is set up somewhere very near the child.
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this case).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Infant Optics Camera vs Scan
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a number of the more current releases on the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competition that actually looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits like bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it is tough to ignore this new kid on the block. Infant Optics Camera vs Scan
However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer image of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs from your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same attributes for a much older version. It has temperature monitoring, which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which allows you to talk to your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all its technological advances, there are 2 things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring larger kids that have much more movement than in-crib babies. The next is a vibration or LED light awake when the baby-end monitor picks up very loud sounds (for example, extreme crying), which is beneficial for consumers that are hard of hearing.
Infant Optics Camera vs Scan
As may be expected from a gadget with multiple features, in addition to a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to install for the technologically challenged. It definitely requires more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with a program that you need to download, etc. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission difficulties, endangering your family’s security. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an Internet connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency might be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end audio and video does not have the same security issues nor the reliance on the Internet.
It may seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we’re not denying that it actually does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like night lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are far more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price difference, we are pretty certain the far more affordable Infant Optics does the same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Infant Optics Camera vs Scan
All these baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the clear choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how active your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you would like to use it to communicate with family scattered around your house. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to enable you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your prized one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.