The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, sound only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of a growing number of technologies, the baby monitors came to adapt complex innovations into their designs.
Now, there are baby monitors that range from purely sound to high definition video recording devices, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity monitoring, crypto security, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does exactly what it is created to do: enable you to check your baby’s safety and comfort with ease, at any given time of the day or night.
From the abundance of options available, we have singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for many years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 captured our attention for getting the right combination of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Arlo Indoor Camera vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they have been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake though, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.
It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers for its simple interface and dependability. It’s no surprise that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors on the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and more than 500,000 sales since its introduction into the marketplace. Arlo Indoor Camera vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
Both baby monitors are favored by customers due to their ease of use at home. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents additional reassurance — no need to worry about hackers infiltrating their personal space! Apart from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology which makes both baby monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the world wide web, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.
Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is most suitable for nighttime or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is ideal for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your infant for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision needs to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Arlo Indoor Camera vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it is a common fact that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out due to extended hours powered ). Infant Optics DXR-8 is conducted on lithium-ion batteries and may be replaced. While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to run up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged in to last through the evening.
Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even looks off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; and its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be okay.
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL
Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also maintains a consistent appearance on lists of best baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. Though many of their features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 specification that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Aside from that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.
Arlo Indoor Camera vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
In terms of installation, Infant Optics’ simple installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.
On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time needed for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a proportion of their charge each month, so expect to need replacements frequently, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) is not encouraged. Extreme temperatures also make the NiMH voltage outputs to fall, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.
With respect to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly bigger screen, but the view is quite limited and has to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you would like to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being adjusted.
No Unnecessary Features Arlo Indoor Camera vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
Though the Motorola boasts of being able to play 5 lullabies, it was really a quite counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to conceal the baby’s sounds, and will not have the ability to tell what’s happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very close to the child.
Overall, you really get what you pay for (or do not, in this case).
Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear
Features Arlo Indoor Camera vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a number of the more current releases in the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that really resembles the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s tough to ignore this new kid on the block. Arlo Indoor Camera vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you’re planning to make vlogs from your footage, it does not really seem that necessary.
The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same attributes for a much older model. It’s temperature monitoring, which can show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way talk capability, which allows you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the night. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!
Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert
For all its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring larger kids that have a lot more movement than in-crib babies. The next is a vibration or LED light awake if the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud sounds (such as extreme crying), which can be beneficial for customers that are hard of hearing.
Arlo Indoor Camera vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
As can be expected from a gadget with multiple features, as well as a WiFi-enabled apparatus, the Arlo Baby may be more challenging to install for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, pair it with an app that you will need to download, and so on. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is just one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.
Connected devices such as the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission difficulties, compromising your family’s safety. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an online connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency might be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end audio and video doesn’t have the same security problems nor the reliance on the Internet.
It can look like the Arlo Baby is packed with terrific features, and we are not denying that it actually does, but for the functions of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you’re probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. Some of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are far more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price difference, we are pretty certain the much cheaper Infant Optics does the same job without hurting your pocket.
Conclusion Arlo Indoor Camera vs Infant Optics Dxr-8
All these baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we have established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the clear choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how busy your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around the home. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to enable you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their safety and your peace of mind is the top priority.
If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.