The very first baby monitor was designed in the 30s, accompanying the expanding medium of radio broadcasting. It started as a humble, audio only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the baby monitors came to adapt complex innovations into their designs.

Presently, there are baby monitors that range from purely sound to high definition video recording devices, with innovative features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto security, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does what it is created to do: allow you to look at your child’s safety and comfort with ease, at any given time of the day or night.

From the abundance of options available, we’ve singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for many years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 grabbed our attention for getting the right combination of functionality, durability, reliability, and innovation. Following are some comparisons with other top competitors.

Arlo Baby Monitor vs Infant Optics

 

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Arlo Baby Monitor vs Infant Optics

Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they’ve been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition remains currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.

It has earned the name “Mighty DXR-8” by doctors and expert tech reviewers because of its simple interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling brand of baby monitors in the market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and more than 500,000 sales since its introduction to the market. Arlo Baby Monitor vs Infant Optics

Features

Security

Both baby monitors are favored by customers for their ease of use at home. Their local-only audio and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents additional reassurance — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their personal space! Aside from utilizing frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology that makes both infant monitors virtually decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.

Interchangeable Lenses

Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is best for night or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the entire nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched on and off, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Arlo Baby Monitor vs Infant Optics

infant-optics-dxr-8-different-lenses

Battery Life

Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it is a common fact that baby monitors tend to burn their batteries out due to prolonged hours powered ). Infant Optics DXR-8 is conducted on lithium-ion batteries and may be substituted. While a full charge claims to last 12 hours, it’s been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged into last through the night.

Durability

Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even appears off-kilter, if we’re nitpicking; and its antennae aren’t that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it could fall from a table and still be okay.

 

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL

Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also maintains a consistent appearance on lists of baby monitors, albeit at the lower ranks. Though many of their features are very similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there’s 1 specification that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other attributes.

Arlo Baby Monitor vs Infant Optics

Installation

Concerning setup, Infant Optics’ easy installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.

Battery Life

On the subject of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with this. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, nearly triple the time necessary for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a percentage of their charge every month, so expect to need replacements often, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) is not encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to drop, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 uses Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.

Video Feed

With regard to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is very limited and needs to be mounted fairly far from the baby if you want to see the whole room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there is some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being corrected.

infant-optics-dxr-8-01

No Unnecessary Features Arlo Baby Monitor vs Infant Optics

Though the Motorola boasts of being able to play 5 lullabies, it was actually a rather counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to mask the baby’s sounds, and won’t be able to tell what is happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very near the child.

Overall, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this instance ).

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear

Features Arlo Baby Monitor vs Infant Optics

How can the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to some of the more current releases in the market? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competition that actually looks like the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s tough to dismiss this new kid on the block. Arlo Baby Monitor vs Infant Optics

But for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we actually need in a baby monitor? It’s true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you’re planning to make vlogs from your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.

The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same attributes for a much older model. It’s temperature monitoring, which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which permits you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!

infant-optics-dxr-8-back-pocket

Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert

For all of its technological advances, there are just two things the Arlo Baby didn’t include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring larger kids that have a lot more mobility than in-crib babies. The next is a vibration or LED light awake when the baby-end monitor picks up very loud sounds (such as extreme yelling ), which is beneficial for consumers who are hard of hearing.

Arlo Baby Monitor vs Infant Optics

Installation

As can be expected from a gadget with multiple features, as well as a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be harder to install for the technologically challenged. It definitely requires more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, pair it with a program that you will need to download, and so on. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is just one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.

Security

Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission issues, compromising your family’s security. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an online connection, problems like feed and connectivity consistency might be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound doesn’t have the exact same security issues nor the reliance on having to go online.

It may look like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we are not denying that it truly does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you are probably better off with the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you might already have at home or are much more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price difference, we’re pretty certain the far cheaper Infant Optics does the same job without hurting your pocket.

Conclusion Arlo Baby Monitor vs Infant Optics

All these baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we’ve established, Infant Optics DXR-8 remains the obvious choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your budget, how busy your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around the home. At the end of the day, all it has to do is to enable you more mobility through the day, and some much deserved rest at night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority.

If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.

 

infant-optics-dxr-8-banner