The very first baby monitor was developed in the 30s, accompanying the growing medium of radio broadcasting. It began as a humble, sound only system that consisted of a microphone, transmitter, and speaker. By the 70s, 2-way intercoms were developed; and by the early 2000s, it had evolved into video-capable units. With the introduction of more and more technologies, the baby monitors came to accommodate complex innovations in their designs.

Now, there are baby monitors that range from only sound to high definition video recording devices, with novel features like temperature sensing, humidity tracking, crypto security, and recorded lullabies and/or white noise makers. The task then becomes how to filter out the”fluff” while ensuring that it does what it is created to do: allow you to look at your child’s safety and comfort with ease, at any given time of the day or night.

From the abundance of options available, we’ve singled out one product that seems to have gotten it right, and has gotten it right for several years now. Infant Optics DXR-8 grabbed our attention for getting the right combination of performance, durability, reliability, and innovation. Below are some comparisons with other top competitors.

Angelcare Ac517 vs Infant Optics

 

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Eufy SpaceView Angelcare Ac517 vs Infant Optics

Probably the only other baby monitor that comes close to the Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor is the one from Eufy SpaceView. At roughly the same price range, they have been elbowing one another for the top spot on reviewers’ lists since 2019. Make no mistake however, Infant Optics DXR-8’s track record for recognition is still currently unbeatable, with awards for the best baby monitor since 2017, including “Best Baby Monitor Of All Time” by New York Magazine.

It has earned the title “Mighty DXR-8” by physicians and expert tech reviewers because of its simple interface and dependability. It’s not surprising that it continues to be the best-selling variant of baby monitors on the current market, with an average of 16,000 units sold monthly on Amazon, and more than 500,000 sales since its introduction into the market. Angelcare Ac517 vs Infant Optics

Features

Security

Both baby monitors are favored by customers for their ease of use in the home. Their local-only sound and video feed provides the utmost safety, giving parents extra reassurance — no need to be worried about hackers infiltrating their private space! Apart from using frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technology that makes both infant monitors almost decrypt-proof, they also don’t connect to the Internet, reducing risks of unwanted data transmission.

Interchangeable Lenses

Infant Optics DXR-8’s edge over the Eufy SpaceView are its variety of interchangeable lenses. The normal lens is most suitable for night or low-light viewing, the wide-angle lens is perfect for viewing the whole nursery, and the telephoto lens can zoom into your baby for greater detail. While Eufy’s night vision has to be manually switched off and on, Infant Optics DXR-8 can detect low-light conditions and automatically switches to its invisible infrared. Angelcare Ac517 vs Infant Optics

infant-optics-dxr-8-different-lenses

Battery Life

Battery is also an issue with the Eufy SpaceView, as it cannot be replaced (and it is a common fact that infant monitors tend to burn their batteries out because of prolonged hours powered ). Infant Optics DXR-8 is run on lithium-ion batteries and can be replaced. While a complete charge claims to last 12 hours, it has been noted to operate up to 15.5 hours. Eufy, on the other hand, may work better plugged into last through the night.

Durability

Lastly, the Infant Optics DXR-8 seems sturdier overall. The Eufy’s kick-stand feels delicate, and even appears off-kilter, if we are nitpicking; and its antennae are not that stable. Inversely, Infant Optics DXR-8’s screen looks like it may fall from a table and still be fine.

 

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Motorola MBP36XL

Generally cheaper than the Infant Optics DXR-8, the Motorola MBP36XL also maintains a consistent presence on lists of best baby monitors, albeit in the lower ranks. While many of their features are quite similar (because how far can you deviate from a baby monitor?), there is 1 specification that makes the Motorola stand out: its 1,000-ft range. Other than that, Infant Optics DXR-8 trumps most of its other features.

Angelcare Ac517 vs Infant Optics

Installation

In terms of installation, Infant Optics’ simple installation cannot be beat, while the Motorola unit requires a screwdriver just for inserting the battery.

Battery Life

On the topic of batteries, the Motorola MBP36XL uses a NiMH rechargeable type for power, which explains the issues we have with it. Charging typically takes 10-12 hours, almost triple the time necessary for Li-ion batteries. NiMH batteries lose a percentage of their charge each month, so expect to need replacements frequently, because overcharging (or keeping the device plugged in) isn’t encouraged. Extreme temperatures also cause the NiMH voltage outputs to drop, while Li-ion batteries are more tolerant to temperature fluctuations. To make the point more succinct, the Infant Optics DXR-8 utilizes Li-ion batteries, adding to its reliability.

Video Feed

With respect to video feed, the Motorola baby monitor has a slightly larger screen, but the view is very limited and has to be mounted fairly far in the baby if you would like to see the entire room. While both Infant Optics and Motorola have tilting and panning, there’s some noise when the Motorola MBP36XL is being adjusted.

infant-optics-dxr-8-01

No Unnecessary Features Angelcare Ac517 vs Infant Optics

Though the Motorola boasts of being able to play 5 lullabies, it was actually a quite counter intuitive function to get a baby monitor; the music has a tendency to conceal the baby’s sounds, and won’t be able to tell what is happening unless the monitor is installed somewhere very near the child.

In general, you really get what you pay for (or don’t, in this case).

Infant Optics DXR-8 vs Arlo Baby by Netgear

Features Angelcare Ac517 vs Infant Optics

How does the Infant Optics DXR-8 compare to a number of the more current releases on the industry? Arlo Baby by Netgear is one such competitor that really resembles the shiny new toy of baby monitors. In customizable character outfits such as bunnies, kittens, and puppies, and features like HD recording, night light, and lullabies, it’s hard to dismiss this new kid on the block. Angelcare Ac517 vs Infant Optics

However, for all its flashy new tricks, how well does it deliver what we really need in a baby monitor? It is true that at 1080p resolution, you get a much clearer picture of your baby, but unless you are planning to make vlogs from your footage, it doesn’t really seem that necessary.

The Infant Optics DXR-8 baby monitor has many of the same attributes for a much older model. It has temperature monitoring, which may show in either Celsius or Fahrenheit; two-way intercom capability, which permits you to speak with your baby from another room; digital zoom of up to 2x, to check out what your baby is playing with; and night vision, for observing changes in your child throughout the evening. Plus, the monitor can fit nicely in your back pocket!

infant-optics-dxr-8-back-pocket

Remote Camera Access and Cry LED Alert

For all its technological advances, there are 2 things the Arlo Baby did not include. One is panning and tilting remotely, which the considerably simpler Infant Optics DXR-8 offers. This feature is especially useful for monitoring bigger kids that have much more mobility than in-crib babies. The second is a vibration or LED light awake if the baby-end monitor picks up quite loud sounds (for example, extreme yelling ), which can be beneficial for customers who are hard of hearing.

Angelcare Ac517 vs Infant Optics

Installation

As can be expected from a gadget with multiple features, as well as a WiFi-enabled device, the Arlo Baby may be harder to set up for the technologically challenged. It definitely needs more steps to connect the baby monitor to a network, calibrate it with an app that you will need to download, etc. As stated previously, Infant Optics’ fool-proof setup is just one of the reasons why parents still prefer it over fancier options.

Security

Connected devices like the Arlo Baby are more vulnerable to hacking or transmission difficulties, endangering your family’s safety. Since it’s dependent on your phone and an online connection, problems like connectivity and feed consistency may be a problem. Infant Optics DXR-8’s radio frequency or end-to-end picture and sound does not have the same security issues nor the reliance on the Internet.

It may seem like the Arlo Baby is packed with great features, and we are not denying that it actually does, but for the purposes of a baby monitor and the price it goes for, you’re probably better off using the tried and tested Infant Optics DXR-8. A few of the functions, like nighttime lights and lullabies, you may already have at home or are far more soothing if sung by a parent consecutively. With a hefty price gap, we are pretty sure the much cheaper Infant Optics does the same job without hurting your pocket.

Conclusion Angelcare Ac517 vs Infant Optics

These baby monitors are the current top choices, but as we’ve established, Infant Optics DXR-8 is still the obvious choice as a one-time investment. However, as parents, you will still be the better judge of what you and your child or family need. It will still depend on your living conditions, your finances, how busy your baby is (or how active you are for that matter), and if you want to use it to communicate with family scattered around your home. At the end of the day, all it must do is to enable you more mobility throughout the day, and some much deserved rest during the night, whilst keeping an eye on your precious one. Their security and your peace of mind is the top priority.

If you’re settled on getting the Infant Optics DXR-8 after reading these comparisons, click here to buy now.

 

infant-optics-dxr-8-banner